Categories
Startups Strategy

Plus, venture capital

Venture Capital (VC) firms in ‘startup land’ are undeniably a source of relentless intrigue and mystique – rightfully so, some may say. For, VCs seem to possess seemingly magical abilities (for instance):

(a.) To ‘foresee’ or as one blog elucidates, envisioning the future that propels society forward.

(b.) To bestow mythical, elevatory titles – unicorn, decacorn (astartup valued > $10 billion) and hectacorn (a startup valued > $100 billion).

Week on week, we awake to read countless tales that revolve around a singular theme – venture capital. Rich with proclamations of abundance, of successes, and of transfigurations from oblivion to stardom.

In the Indian context too VC firms undoubtedly exert an undeniable influence on the ecosystem at large. Close to 10% of India’s 80,000 startups have received some form of funding. A number that’s growing at a staggering 19% CAGR.

But, what is often overlooked as a consequence of the mythic-ness of the industry is that venture capital firms too are near constantly seeking a potion of startup and entrepreneur who have the highest potential of de-risking their commitments. A need that takes a number of expressions, including:

1. Potent keywords – ‘IIT’, ‘IIM’ and ‘McKinsey’. Rationalized with a bevy reasons from an apparent risk taking appetite to leverageable alumni networks.

Watch] In a rare interview, Kunal Shah talks about building Cred ...
Kunal Shah, the Founder of CRED and erstwhile Founder of FreeCharge.

2. The ‘social proof’ that a second time entrepreneur brings to the table. Case in point, Accel’s Rebound program.

Leading to the ‘pool’ of investment worthy startups becoming remarkably and unsurprisingly limited.

Any attempt to pierce a veil – necessitates a 360 view. Flipping perspectives, from that of an investee to an investor. So, what must a firm (today) do to distinguish and differentiate itself? I.e., looking beyond the basic, mandatory promise of capital to attract the best and brightest.

Q1. Are there certain ‘standout strategies’ that VC firms (primarily in India) have adopted? The outliers.

Q2. What is starting to be included in the expanding definition of an investment?

Let’s take a peek at the emerging:

1. Taking advantage of the most scarce currency in the world = time, Indian VC WaterBridge Ventures introduced a productized offering christened Fast Forward, a structured model which guarantees feedback in five days, a decision in 10 days and release of capital in 20 days.

2. The sectoral specialists’ (> generalists) edge. Venture capitalists have emerged with a laser sharp focus on a specific sector, such as healthcare focused venture capital fund HealthQuad or the cleantech business catalyst Infuse Ventures which is housed at IIM Ahmedabad’s Centre for Innovation Incubation and Entrepreneurship (CIIE).

3. Blume Ventures, one of India’s most celebrated homegrown venture capital firms offers a ‘suite’ of auxiliary services as a key component of their core value proposition, these consist of financial and legal assistance, recruitment, business development support, founder learning and development etc.

4. And then there is Antler (which has just recently opened shop in India), a truly early stage VC that emphasizes on people > idea / product. Or, as they put it, Antler aims to select the world’s most brilliant and determined people, help them find the right co-founder. AKA, a co-founder matchmaking service.

5.1. The Hive, a VC Fund and ‘co-creation studio’ anchored by the Patni Family (of Patni Computer Systems fame) is (as they term it) a high touch model which among other things compliments and catalyses the startup’s technology innovation / progress. Delivering inherent expertise + a proprietary stack known as Euclid, enhances and expedites the development (and execution) of production grade machine learning models.

5.2. Similarly, another interesting model is that of Spring Marketing Capital – an entity that has positioned itself as a ‘skin in the game marketing consulting company’. Riding on a now established structure of Fund + Services. Essentially, influencing the creation of effective brands through a unique mix of capital and capabilities.

6. Market access as the Fund’s USP, a mutually beneficial partnership that amplifies scale. Anthill Ventures has conceptualized a number of such cross-industry platforms / (accelerator) programs. For instance, Anthill Studio for media and entertainment startups or ‘Urban’ to scale brands for urban India. The proposition is more or less consistent – market access partners, infrastructure support and mentorship.

7. Funding that enables and accelerates through synergies – a perfect example of this model is Microsoft’s M12 which allows startups access to Microsoft technology, thought leaders and engineering teams to explore product integrations. Cisco Investments would be another instance of a pseudo VC propagating this model. With the ‘feature’ of using the power of their ~ 17,000 strong sales force, network of channel partners and established customer base to speed up your go-to market.

Interestingly certain threads tie together what at first glance may seem disparate.

– The surge in standardization and productization. Consistent investment structures (ex., dilution percentages). Evolving as a science > an art. At the fringes (especially, globally) beginning to witness a greater role for data analytics and AI inside the firm.

– Incrementally looking for opportunities to get involved early on (the early bird gets the worm?). To the extent of partnering with exceptional teams (EVEN) in the pre-idea stage.

– Mere capital is inadequate, the rising expectation that a VC’s value / role in the startup’s success must extend beyond funding. For instance: Expertise, services, ecosystem etc.

Venture Capital 2.0.

REALTY CHECK. Each time a new VC firm launches, it, in a bow to Darwinism claims to be of a new breed. Rightfully so, with 2020 commencing with more than ~ $7 billion in dry powder (capital to be invested) – there exists a need to completely reimagine investor-investee matchmaking process.

There is enough seed money available in India waiting for quality start-ups.

Kris Nair, Founder, Opdrage Ventures.

For, it can be argued that an industry that claims to foster and champion innovation may need to introspect and reverse creeping stagnation.

Categories
Digital Strategy

When bytes define bites

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been thinking about what to research (and write), a shift that would be both – relevant and comforting.

And then, instead of hitting me, I ate it. I speak (fondly) of food. Which is today, becoming a flavourful space through the increasing involvement of technology.

In the midst of the seismic changes in dependencies. When the internet trumps the chef – how does the average Joe (or Rohan) react? How do they mark their territory? Tap the ample digital-first solutions instead of being overwhelmed by them.

In reality, everyone is keen on taking a bite. One of the latest (and arguably most illustrious) entrants is Mr. Travis Kalanick (yes, the charming erstwhile co-founder and face of Uber).

His latest initiative, aptly christened CloudKitchens (aka, City Storage Systems) is in many ways the WeWork (pre-IPO debacle) of the Virtual Kitchens / Ghost Kitchens / Dark Kitchens etc., world. Of the many striking similarities – ambition and an almost limitless pool of funding (~ $700 million), are in equal parts a significant validation AND worrisome. With that being said, the venture may deserve to be embraced with open arms. Why you may ask. Let’s find out…

It’s no mystery that akin to almost everything under the sun – F&B consumption too is rapidly digitising. To an extent that analytics and app market data company, App Annie estimates that in 2018 – India saw a staggering 900% jump in F&B app downloads. With numbers like those, it’s no surprise that the food ordering market is operating at a CAGR of 16%, expected to touch a mouth-watering $17 billion by 2023.

In the midst of the above – India (according to NRAI) has 100,000 restaurants for a population of ~ 1.3 billion. Which equals a mere 0.007% penetration. Compare that against the percentage of the dragon next door – where the figure is a far more respectable/reasonable 5%.

At this point – I’ll take a cop-out and invoke the millennial. Which to say that until recently, the aforementioned gap was perfectly understandable considering the cultural and per capita income disparity. But, can that confidently be claimed to be the scenario we/we’ll find ourselves in today – tomorrow?

Yes, there is a significant gap here – between a dramatic rise in demand and an unimpressive supply.

Now, layer that with the fact that a market in its formative stages – has already seen a pre-mature consolidation. An often overlooked/forgotten side-effect of hyper-funding. Leading to a, for all practical purposes, duopoly – in the form of Zomato and Swiggy (even more so now, after Zomato gobbled up UberEats).

A case of too much power in the hands of a privileged few (or two)? Well, it doesn’t end there – much to the dismay of a few visionary restaurant owners. For, the ambition is to evolve from mere distribution to becoming enablers of production – and even producers themselves.

A study by LimeTray (a restaurant software and marketing solutions company) highlights the role of platforms in influencing choices. Such that, strangely, the road/conduit has become the brand.

In that context, the aggregators seem to believe that they are strategically positioned to take on the industry’s broader challenges. And, why not?

The trouble is, rather than adapting to the world we live in – restaurants operate in a near-constant state of conflict with the platforms. With, ~ 34% of those surveyed (LimeTray study) boldly declaring that reaching the customer directly is their BIGGEST challenge. But, it isn’t. Sorry. Limiting the platform’s involvement as mere logistics partners – is.

For, in the quest to avoid going quietly into the night (aka, becoming indistinguishable names on a catalogue) – independence/autonomy is the key. And that is only doable through a thought through perspective on three fronts:

–       Brand development and data ownership

–       Experimentative new business models

–       Enhanced operational efficiencies

A near-perfect example of a company that has successfully pivoted its business after acknowledging/appreciating market realities is – Rebel Foods (the evolved form of Faasos). Launching 10 new brands in quick succession – building them in a manner akin to how Unilever tackles soaps. I.e., multiple brands, ONE kitchen. Becoming (in their words) the Xiaomi (sought after, non-commoditized entity) on Amazon or Flipkart (the aggregators).

The secret? A fair slice of the pie is reserved only for those who truly align with the need to expand the meaning of innovation in the kitchen. Be it by leveraging Capillary’s Loyalty Program to enhance customer stickiness, CloudKitchen’s product to rise above the Zomato-Swiggy exclusivity tug-of-war or, Pet Pooja’s ecosystem led approach to restaurant management.

Categories
Brands Strategy

Unthinking design

UX as a concern isn’t the exclusive domain of those who operate in the digital realm.

A fact that we often, conveniently forget.

At a store of Starbucks India, I’ve struggled and seen my fellow patrons struggle for months – with little to absolutely nada changing.

Now the question that arises, are ‘bugs’ like these unfortunately overlooked or intentionally ignored?

Categories
Startups Strategy

Where is the mattress tonight?

image

A cursory search for a key weapon (aka the mattress) in the arsenal of every ‘sleepyhead’ was revelatory, to say the least.

Meet an industry, that is at a certain level no different from the countless similar legacies: in the midst of an evolution. But. At another level, a symbol of quality of life.

Never before heard of brands are seeking more than a one night stand. And commercially, that seems to make perfect sense.

The classic, almost cliched story of a large (~ $2-3 billion dollars) unorganized high growth (~ 10% CAGR) market meeting ‘proven’ in the west model of disruption (think: Casper, the company that shook the US mattress industry).

What’s the pitch? The pattern adhering, usual speak of superior quality, service democratized through a direct-to-consumer approach.

Today, the online mattress market is at measly 1-1.5%: which is a mouth-watering opportunity for any self-respecting investor.

And boy their sure are enough and more ‘bed-in-a-box’ players to go around. From Emma (a European brand being led by Abhinav Kumar of Trivago fame/infamy) to Wakefit, Sunday, SleepyCat, and who(?) knows how many more.

All singing an uncannily familiar tune,

  • An uncomplicated, buying experience. I.e., in most cases, you’ll land on a SINGLE easy to customize product page (like so on, Emma).
  • Don’t take our word for it. Trials of anywhere between 30 to 100 days.
  • A 3-year to a lifetime warranty.
  • Claims of superior technology: memory foam, breathable/cool fabric.
  • Sustainable: made with eco-friendly and non-toxic materials.
  • Financial innovation through digital payments, EMI options.

All six of the above are convincing arguments neatly packaged on UX ‘woke’ websites.

Reading the state of affairs, one could even say that mass acceptance of this phenomena isn’t a pipe dream. Its time does seem to have come. And why would it be? After all, this, is nothing more than a pilot. New-age companies will raise more, make investments in brand and consumer education.

At that point, what incentive would you have to deal with the current system propagated, championed by the likes of Kurl-on and Sleepwell? None.

The problem is as the traditional outfits focus on organizing the fragmented (the transition from unbranded to branded), they’re poised to be disrupted in the very market they themselves played a major role in developing.

Unless. Of course. They decide to radically re-imagine themselves and their business models, get ahead of this curve. And, no, that does NOT mean being available on Amazon or launching an e-store. On the contrary, it is a sign that suggests the need to actively participate in the shift from being mattress companies to being sleep/sleep solution companies (For example, did you know Wakefit helps organisations set up nap rooms in their campuses?). Thereby, riding on the ‘wellness’ bandwagon.

For, little did Serta, Simmons and Sealy (the top three players in US market) realize that post the launch of Casper (the largest of the new-age mattress companies): the most growth either of them would see would = ~ 0.4% (2014-18).

One can only hope that yesterday’s (in the context of India) sleep experts, wake up.